
The other clip was from an art gallery containing some abstract art, where the set up was that the subject (or victim perhaps?) was examining the paintings with an “expert.” This expert would tell the subject what the artwork was depicting, and the subject almost invariably agreed, despite no evidence of the boats, ocean, or people suggested in the painting. The clincher came when the expert would say that he’d just realized that the painting was upside down, and now saw different figures in the art, which the subjects willingly accepted as well. It’s quite frightening how much we will accept without serious consideration, simply because of their desire to consent or respect an expert’s opinion. Hopefully I’m not kowtow all of the time, but I think I can certainly fall victim to this tendency. This conformity has really ingrained itself into our society, and has allowed phenomena like group think to take place. Group think is basically what happens when a group that follows its leader unequivocally, dismiss outside opinions, and do not critically examine their own decisions. As my psych profs are all left-wing (yay!), we frequently look at the Bush administration as a strong case of group think. Not only has the U.S. become a place where phrases like “you’re either with us or against us” are acknowledged as sane, but it’s also a country where supporting the troops requires supporting the president, and analytical evaluation of this president’s actions is reserved only for “bleeding-heart liberals.”
Perhaps the coolest thing we learned in our discussion of conformity was the fact that Christians, especially Protestants, are far less prone to conformity to acts like violence and aggression that occurred in the Holocaust. Not that Christians are necessarily far superior to others in terms of our morality, but it was encouraging to hear that Christians are deliberate about their values, and at least try to conform to God’s will rather than their own or someone else’s. I try to be my own individual and not just go with the flow, particularly when it comes to stuff like what companies I support with my purchasing power and my beliefs about others and the world in general. I’ve always been a black sheep, particularly in Christian circles where I have left-wing views and like a lot of secular music and books. Not that I don’t consider or accept Christian views on politics or check out Christian music and literature (I do love authors like C.S. Lewis and bands like Delirious). I simply love a lot of stuff, and some of it is non-“Christian.” However, it’s definitely important for me to not get caught up in any anti-conformism rhetoric, because there are certain universal truths that most of us should and do accept, and some things and people that are so fantastic that most individuals, including me, should be able to enjoy them.
In my family, the latest conversation about conformity relates to the upcoming election (seven days left!). My mom tends to “join the bandwagon” when she votes federally, and thus votes Liberal because the NDP usually have no chance of electing a candidate, and the Liberal candidate is the only one with a chance of edging out Rahim Jaffer. My dad and I, on the other hand, refuse to let such strategy taint our vote, because democracy means voting for who you believe in, not necessarily the lesser of two evils. Thus, our votes seldom “count” in the grand scheme of things, but we have the satisfaction of having exercised our beliefs. This is why PR (proportional representation) is definitely something to consider. I really am in love with Canada’s political system; I love the fact that the MP for my riding will write a letter of congratulations to my parents when they have their 25th wedding anniversary, and come to talk to me during elections. However, with the onset of voter apathy and the growth of smaller parties in Canada, PR could have an important role to play in this century of politics. Layton has even proposed a form of proportional representation that would incorporate our ridings, so I’ve been mulling over whether I’d support this in a referendum or not (although I don’t think PR will have an opportunity to be put into place for quite a few more years).

Our family was the biggest family in the church, with my aunt and uncle, grandma and grandpa, and my parents and sister, and when my aunt and uncle started going to Strathcona after we were attending McKernan, church was drastically different for my grandparents. My grandpa has been retired for more than ten years now, but was preaching sermons because of the transition that was taking place. It hurt my mom a lot to see her parents working through the mess at Zion when we had left them there, and while I see God working in the congregation at Zion right now, it seemed unfair for my grandparents to be facing this in their eighties. I still feel weird without that community, and while McKernan is slowly becoming a part of my life, I know that it will never be the same. Of course, God has worked through this shift in my life, and His purposes in this hardship are becoming clearer, but the differences between small and big churches are certainly marked. Everything from worship to bible studies still seem strange at times, and it’s bizarre not to know people who attend the same church as me. Attending McKernan has meant not conforming to my previous close mindedness when it came to big churches, but it has meant conforming to the Christian norm of being part of a large community.
Part of the difficulty of resolving to leave Zion was a result of the difficulty of discerning God’s will for that situation. Although our family and friends totally backed our choice, it didn’t feel right at times, and Scripture, especially Paul’s books in the New Testament, didn’t seem to endorse leaving a church at all. Rather, there were verses about working through strife in a Christian community and remaining strong in God through difficulty. God answered our indecision eventually, and made it clear that our spiritual lives would be bettered by this change, but this uncertainty about God’s plan was totally echoed in this passage from Mark that I read in my devotions recently. Jesus was praying about whether he should remain where he was and continue his ministry there, or move on. His disciples interrupted Him in the midst of prayer, and the commentary I read along with this passage suggested that Jesus’ reliance on God to make a decision demonstrates how we should make choices. Jesus listened to those around Him, but ultimately waited patiently on God to make things clear. There’s always a competing collection in my life, whether it be friends, family, the Bible, or what I see around me, but when I take these different perspectives to God, He has always come back to me with an answer. One of my family’s friends from Zion is so dutiful with this call that he prays before even buying a $10 book because he doesn’t want to make any decisions apart from God. While I’ve never felt convicted to prayerfully consider every purchase I make, it’s certainly a reminder of what to consider when making decisions.

I hope at least you’re enjoying this weather!
2 comments:
It's seems cold enough for me Cait! I'm quite afraid that you've jinxed us now. Not that jinxes exist, but you never know!
good entry! I wish every Christian shared our left-wing views, but I guess that's the beauty of diversity, protestantism, and democracy. I'm definitely enjoying the nice weather!
Post a Comment